Let’s say a compliance platform cost $12,000 annually. How much is it?
The replacement it makes will determine the final answer.
If the automation process eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious evidence collection in a tangled technology system, $12,000 might be money well spent. It would be a different calculation when a team of seven people could collect the same amount of evidence in just the time of a few minutes every month.
This is a good method of looking for a Vanta alternative. Don’t begin with asking which platform offers the greatest features. Think about what features save your company in actual time and energy.
Automation is an economic break-even Point
Compliance automation isn’t inherently either good or negative. Scale changes its value. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has hundreds of employees several cloud environments, numerous applications, and regular access changes. Gathering evidence manually could be a major burden for the operation. Integrations that automate monitoring systems and gather evidence can easily justify the cost.
Imagine a small-scale business of 10 people getting ready to go through its initial SOC 2 audit. Consider a startup with 10 employees in preparation for its first SOC 2.
This difference is important in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. The capabilities of a high-end platform are impressive, however they only offer financial value in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is important to compare the services, features, contracts and quotes of both platforms. Both are well-established compliance platforms that concentrate on automation and integrations.
Another decision needs to be made first, however. Do you require a Compliance platform that integrates? Certain companies require constant monitoring as well as automated collection of evidence. Other businesses would prefer to provide their own evidence, especially when workload is modest.
Vanta Competitors don’t all follow the same pattern.
Many Vanta competitors are also in a similar category that is focused on automation. The market also includes lighter platforms designed around organizing rather than extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. It was developed by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central work area, provides editable policy and evidence guidelines, and lets auditors review submitted evidence with access to only read-only.
It doesn’t connect to operational systems, or create infrastructure agents. Customers choose and upload the documents they would like to present.
The consideration of access to the System in the Making
Eliminating integrations has a distinct disadvantage: someone must collect evidence by hand.
The application for compliance doesn’t require integration, and it can be used without any ongoing connections to the operating environment.
The designs of either are not superior to the other. Which one is appropriate for your company?
CertAssist aims at teams of five to 200 employees and gives pricing information rather than having to have the sales pitch. Its official launch price is $225 per month, compared with a regular price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Get Its Due
The requirements of a 10 person business today will not necessarily be its needs at 100 or 500 employees.
A simple platform could make sense if compliance remains simple. When systems, employees frameworks, and evidence requirements increase, the financials could eventually favor deeper automation. Allow complexity to take the lead when purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. You should purchase them only when the cost to do the task they replace manually is more expensive.