Imagine a compliance system costs $12,000 per year. Does it cost a lot?
It’s all about what you’re replacing.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours repetitive evidence collection in a complex technology system, $12,000 might be a wise investment. If a company of seven could collect the same information by hand in just a few hours each month, the figure looks considerably different.
It is a great method to look for Vanta alternatives. Identifying the platform with the greatest features is not the first step. Ask your company about how these features will save you time and money.
Automated Manufacturing is an End-of-Even
It’s not necessarily either good or bad. The benefits of compliance automation is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a tech company that is growing, with numerous cloud environments, many applications and frequent changes to access. The effort of manually capturing evidence continuously could become very excessive. Integrations that can automatically monitor systems and collect evidence may be able to justify the cost.
Imagine a small-scale business of 10 people who are preparing to go through its initial SOC 2. audit. It might have a small infrastructure, and the gathering of evidence can be managed with no significant automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. A sophisticated platform can provide large capabilities, but those capabilities can only provide financial value when the company actually needs they.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Searching for Vanta Vs. Drata can quickly turn into an exercise of feature-by-feature. Both platforms are built upon automation and are integrated companies that are looking to adopt this approach can benefit from looking at the frameworks they support by their integrations, as well as the service and individual quotes and contracts.
There’s another decision to make first. Do you want to use a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Certain businesses would prefer continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and automated evidence collection. Some prefer to provide evidence themselves, especially when the work load is not too heavy.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the same model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete in the same category of automation. On the market, there are platforms with less cluttered designs that focus more on organization rather than connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. CertAssist was created by internal auditors and compliance experts. It combines framework controls into a single work space and allows for editing of guidelines for policy as well as evidence. Auditors have the ability to examine evidence provided through a purely read interface.
It doesn’t install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers can upload evidence that they want to use.
Access to the Factor System into the Decision
The removal of integrations comes with a clear disadvantage: somebody must gather evidence by hand.
It also gets rid of integration setup and this means that the compliance application does not require constant connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
The architectures are not universally superior. Which tradeoff is right for your company?
CertAssist aims at teams that have between five and 200 employees and provides pricing information rather than having to have an in-person sales meeting. The starting price is $225 per month, which is a significant reduction from the standard cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Have Its Place
The requirements of a 10 person startup today won’t necessarily be its needs when it has 100 or 500 employees.
A light platform may be beneficial while compliance stays simple. As systems, employees, frameworks, and requirements for evidence expand, the economics may ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity play a role when buying compliance technologies.
Don’t buy fifty integrations merely because they appear attractive on a comparison chart. You should pay for them only when the manual tasks they replace becomes the more costly option.